Wednesday, May 02, 2012
Excess burden of Income taxes
Excess burden is the economic loss to society due to the tax
enforced by the government. In other words, consumers make different choices
because of the tax, and these choices may not be the best or most efficient
economically. For example, the income tax lowers the discretionary income
available to consumers to use in the market, therefore buying less. Producers
of goods and services have to account for the taxes in their costs, causing the
prices of goods to rise. Overall, these taxes decrease how many goods are
produced and purchased in the market, negatively affecting the economy. It has
a negative impact on the overall social welfare, because less income is being
used in the market. Markets, over time, decrease poverty, and by decreasing the
amount of resources and money available for the market to be used, social
welfare is diminished. Also, there are the administrative costs of enforcing
and collecting a tax; this is money that could also have been used in other
ways that are more economically efficient and improve the overall economy.
A better alternative is using consumption tax and no income
tax. A consumption tax has excess burden (all taxes do that aren’t corrective
taxes), but the excess burden is smaller compared to an income tax. This means
less negative impact on overall social welfare, and when people talk about changes
in taxes it often is related to social welfare and trying to relieve tax burden
on certain groups, such as the middle class. A consumption tax has less excess
burden, therefore is better on social welfare overall. It also addresses other social welfare
concerns that often come up in discussion, such as the lack of wealth and large
amounts of debt people have in the US. If consumption was taxed, rather than
income and wealth, it would incentivize saving. This would increase overall
wealth of US citizens, addressing another common issue discussed about the
economy and social welfare. People would have more discretionary income, which
would make up for the possible higher taxation of purchasing goods. In most
states, we already pay sales tax so it would not be that large of an adjustment
to the change. If the effect taxes have on social welfare is one of the main concerns,
this would be the best approach to take.
Danielle Pierson