Sunday, April 01, 2012
Rate regulation of health insurance premiums
The state of CA talked about having regulation of health
insurance premiums, so that any decision by a health insurance company to
increase premiums would have to be approved by a state agency. When government
regulation is involved, it’s to deal with a negative externality. In this case,
the externality is that if premiums are too high, less people can afford the
insurance, and uninsured people cost everybody money when they don’t pay their
medical bills. This idea is a whole other issue to discuss from an economic
view, but I want to focus on this idea of rate regulation. The government is
creating a price ceiling here, assuming more people will be able to get health
insurance this way. However, if you look at a graph; if the equilibrium the
market would get is at one price, and the price ceiling is below this,
essentially the market moves down the supply curve. This means that at this
price, the health insurance companies will only be willing to meet a certain
level of demand; it’s not worth it to them to do more than that. So, the
government won’t be getting more people insured; less people will be insured.
These people may be happier because their premiums are lower, but it won’t
serve the purpose of getting more people insured. Another way the suppliers could respond is to
keep prices that low, they offer a lower quality product; for health insurance,
that means changing how much they cover expenses, and what they cover. Since
supposedly another huge concern for the government is the amount of underinsured
people, this won’t help them either if everyone gets insured, but at an
inadequate level (although, what is adequate coverage could also be another
topic of consideration).
Overall, this is an example of force on the market causing the problems the government says it’s trying to correct. Competition among companies will drive prices down to a fair level over time. There’s no way of knowing how long that time will take, but allowing the market to act freely will achieve better, lasting results at lowering premiums and getting more people adequately insured than setting a price ceiling.
Overall, this is an example of force on the market causing the problems the government says it’s trying to correct. Competition among companies will drive prices down to a fair level over time. There’s no way of knowing how long that time will take, but allowing the market to act freely will achieve better, lasting results at lowering premiums and getting more people adequately insured than setting a price ceiling.
Dani Pierson-Cook