Saturday, October 15, 2005
The judicial fails in Oregon
A judge overturned a voter-passed property compensation law as unconstitutional . . . The law, passed in November 2004, requires that state and local governments compensate land owners when regulations lower property values or waive the rules.
How do you think the law might violate the Constitution?
I think the law is a good one. Why should property owners be forced to endure a reduction in wealth because government wants to regulate their land?
How do you think the law might violate the Constitution?
I think the law is a good one. Why should property owners be forced to endure a reduction in wealth because government wants to regulate their land?
